Antonio Contiliano
|
|||
«Poetry
and folly cohabit in a fluid and turbulent woven, whose boundaries are
ambiguous, ambivalent confinements, that dissolve themselves and move in a
route that is always a rhizomatous beginning. Poetry and folly have the
connection and the complementarity of the body and the shade. It concerns
however a complementarity that certainly is not linearly prepared. Its run
in fact crosses the writing of a space-time whose multi-dimensionality
flows asymptotically and for secret synapses in manifold metamorphoses.
The attempt to separate and to study them as a matter of an objective
representation is not able if not to alter and to mystify of it, also
seeking the clarity of the distinction, the complex interlacement of
"real" polyvalent and determinable starting from the possible
which constitutes the mobile base of it. An object and a subject, set the one of forehead to the other, without to hold account of the mutual
historical and cultural conditioning that makes them be in a dialectic of
the not overcoming, it would be an only impracticable abstraction and an
impossible jump as that of an observer who would like to be out the whole
conditions which create the object or an observable and legible determined
state of things ... |
|
||
(Antonino Contiliano, Kairós Desdichado, Pomopres, Palermo, 1998, p.14) |
|||
|
... The circulation prohibition, imposed to the madness and
the shadow inside the city and in the city-of-science, because they
threaten the forecast and the acknowledgment of the social identity and
characterizes them like of the uniformity of the scientific acquaintance,
is ... removed by the production of poetry and art. Here the statue of the
acquaintance, the knowledge and living the relationship
word-referentiality changes connotation; the madness freely circulates
without some interdiction and the inter-raging-action [interrogation] of
the poiesis employs at the most its potentiality the poietic praxis in the
flow of the "inter" of the poetic inter-raging-action [interrogation]
... |
||
e
odore d'alghe non veste l'umidosera
dagli steccati la negritudine apartheid Altri
giorni, altri morti, lo stesso fucile Vecchie
radici nutrite di vino antico cercano
rigogli e foglie di luce e prati a
dire finestre sull'infinito altrove sepolto o
diroccate speranze al crocevia del dissenso. Nel
suo letto il fiume naviga verso il mare e
il cuore che non ama oppressione e silenzio per
gli spirituals nati nel carcere delle piantagioni. (Antonino Contiliano, Gli Albedi del Sole, ILAPALMA, Palermo-São Paulo, 1998, p.52) |
|||
... inter
here, in fact, is amid and duration-during, relation, function, fused and
without cuts worldliness, cumpossibilty: linearity, circularity, cyclicity,
planning. eschatology, utopy, opening-chaos, invisibile and not
rappresentabile but dicibile through
a semiotic mixage, paradox, conjecture, silence and however sense and new
trial-like referentiality not subjectable to the logical normal school of
the meant one of the bivalent truth |
|
||
questo infinito è senza
lutto tu dici perché quel
giorno delizie (Antonino Contiliano, La Soglia dell'Esilio, Prova d'Autore, Catania, 2000, p.50) |
|||
|
... time
of poetry is not that of the instants, atomic unity that linearly happens
one after the other according to the aut aut of the rule of not
contradiction but that of the "very small or infinitesimal time
interval" where the duration is a during that makes topical the
cumpossibility of the ambivalence, of the polivalence and of the polisemy,
since it is worth the heuristic of the tertium datur and of the logic of
the formality Disorder, atopy, dis-location, loss and suspension of the identity-difference of the "logos", of law and of the arrangement they irrupt in the intersubjective language of the daily and scientific tipicalness, unhinging the rational uni-versality of the classical uni-verse and with it the almost univocality of the non poetic communication ... |
||
|
|||
...
The
disorder, the not uniformity, the not foreseeable and irreversible
variability does non prevent neither the investigation nor the awareness
neither the knowledge, if it is true that today, for example, the geometry
of frattales and the theory of the opening-chaos can say-aleatory the
real-ale(a) in his jagged complex contingency passaging on the verge of
the potentially infinite possible The poetry’s knowledge, as folly’s, suspends the accredited logical-linguistics naming accreditata and with it the role and the function of all the parts of the dis-course by that who dia-logues in the dis-order of the mis-coinceved without, however, annuling the same knowing. The knowledge is here, in fact, that of the as if things were and were not because a phaos-saphés (light) of light and dark, in the daytime and night, of reason and not reason, of a reason that has its own folly as a folly that has its reason that wants to make itself logos, word, unhinging the standardized intersujective communication without abolishing the same communication. And this happens in the poetry. |
|
||
The poiesis has in fact a praxis that, since tied up a preexisting oral network and the word of other subjects step by step emergent in the temporal flow, produces actions, relationships, unpredictable ambiguous exchanges and nevertheless legible because, open to a determined signification always inventiveness, discoverer and therefore open to a renewed polisemia able to go beyond the same oneiric likelihood of the dream. From here the folly of its contingent saying that escapes both reality and dream, both the truth and the verisimilar of science that, separating them according to the law of not contradiction, of identity, of the third excluded or of the procedures of the classical science, distinguishes in the possible one the reality and the unreal, the rational and the irrational or the not-rational»(1) |
|||
... correre di gambe su
battigia con le svento |
|||
|
|
||
The civil and political aspect is there where, using instrumentation of various 'rhetorical-poetic' diversification, the language of the basic (literal-material) communication is submitted to torsions and distorsions of various nature and kind to produce desecration, irony, parody, sarcasm, 'materialist' allegory and involvement of the hypothetical consumer/reader that wrestles with the text. And this because they are not meant to transmit but to build together delving into the 'orientations' of sense, and alternative to the system: the poet is not an anymore "official", but a critic and as such he opts, starting from the practice of the polysemic signification poetic, for "a non representative and not-power democracy, and for a 'moltidude' of social singleness in horizontal walk as expressed by the no-global movements. This change tendential and tendentious e has made me meet and approach various poets and poetics ...»(2) |
|||
parole orchidee in r-onda
urticaria inzacchera di vento l'uomo
più triste ogni sera non dare alle
palpebre scrivo
prigioni questi cieli galleggianti
|
|||
|
|||
(Antonino Contiliano, Terminali e Muquenti, Promopress, Catania, 2005, p.20; p.14) |
(1)
«Salvo
Imprevisti », XVII, n.45-4647, Firenze,
set.88-ag.89,
pp. 13, 14.
(2)
«Marsala c'è» (www.marsalace.it) Interview to Nino
Contiliano edited by Vincenzo Figlioli.
*******************************
|
|||||||
|